Showing posts with label secrets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secrets. Show all posts

Saturday, April 13, 2013

CPA secrets: Accountants charge higher prices for difficult clients


Very few people in this world wake up in the morning excited to go do tax returns. After 10 years in this job — and I’m only 34, so I guess I’ve been doing this now a third of my life — I actually do wake up every morning excited to go to work. And the reason is, I’m truly helping people.


Of course there are bad days. The phone calls when I have to tell someone they owe $ 60,000 and they pass out, but there’s so many good days. I make most of my income April of each year, so the rest of the year I get to stay home with my kids and have a good time. It really is a great profession.


So tax return pricing — I personally have a price list. It’s per form. So if you have a Schedule C, I’m going to tell you that is going to cost between $ 85 and $ 175.


Whether we state this or not, accountants have little extra charges they throw in for the people who make their lives more difficult. So if somebody arrives with everything tied out in a nice, neat pile — the price is going to be cheaper than somebody that arrives with a shoebox. We might not put that in writing. We might not state that out front. However, jokingly in the industry it’s called a PITA fee — Pain In The (fill in the blank). If you make our life more difficult, if you end up calling a month later and say, ‘Oh whoops, I forgot these three things,’ then we are going to call it the remailing fee or the reprinting fee.


The more easy you make your accountant’s life, the cheaper your price will be. I did actually have for the first time this year somebody that called and said that their dog ate their 1099. So I honestly didn’t charge for that excuse because that just cracked me up. So if you also make me smile, sometimes your price is a little cheaper as well.


There’s always some pretty memorable clients. For instance, someone works in a hair salon that insists they get to deduct their hair and nails because they’re in the industry. And they would talk to the other girls in the shop and everybody would say they are taking the deductions. Well I looked at a couple of returns and I found out that no one was taking the deduction.


What accountants sort of do is shake our heads and smile and nod and say, ‘Sure, no problem. We’ll take that.’ And then we never put it on the return because, of course we don’t want to get our clients upset, but we also don’t want them doing anything illegal.


Latest Stories on Marketplace.org




CPA secrets: Accountants charge higher prices for difficult clients

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Lawmakers lambast Fed, others for hiding behind "trade secrets"



Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke is questioned by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke is questioned by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on ”The Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress.” in Washington February 26, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Gary Cameron






WASHINGTON | Wed Apr 10, 2013 7:01pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Two Democratic lawmakers lambasted federal regulators whom they accuse of using an obligation to protect bank “trade secrets” as an excuse not to hand over details of a botched review of home foreclosures.


“Breaking the law is not a corporate trade secret,” Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Representative Elijah Cummings of Maryland told the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in a letter on Wednesday.


The regulators reached settlements worth about $ 9.3 billion with 13 banks earlier this year to end case-by-case reviews of whether they had wrongly seized homes or begun the foreclosure process.


Some $ 3.6 billion of that money will go toward cash payments to borrowers. Some payments, most averaging between $ 300 and $ 600, are set to go out on Friday.


Regulators had already turned over some information about the reviews, but the lawmakers wanted to look at documents concerning the types of abuses committed by each mortgage servicer


But regulators resisted turning over such information and said documents involved are trade secrets, or subject to confidentiality agreements, according to the lawmakers.


“We strongly believe that documents should not be withheld from any Member of Congress based on the flawed argument that illegal activity by banks is somehow their proprietary business information,” the pair wrote to the two regulators.


A Fed spokesman acknowledged receipt of the letter, but would not comment further. A spokesman for the OCC said the agency does not comment on congressional correspondence.


The letter set the stage for a Thursday hearing before a Senate banking subcommittee at which lawmakers are expected to grill OCC and Fed officials for what they believe was an opaque and mismanaged review process.


The regulators ended the reviews that began in 2011, which were supposed to find and compensate harmed borrowers, through settlements in January with servicers including units of Bank of America Corp, Citigroup Inc, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and Wells Fargo & Co.


By then some $ 2 billion had already been paid out to consultants who conducted the reviews, even though no money had been paid out to eligible borrowers.


Regulators said on Tuesday that borrowers whose homes were in foreclosure in 2009 and 2010 could expect to begin receiving checks later this week, the vast majority of which will be less than $ 1,000.


In testimony to be delivered on Thursday, OCC Deputy Chief Counsel Daniel Stipano apologized for the agency’s mistakes in handling the reviews.


“In retrospect, it is clear that our approach…did not serve the agency’s objectives which were, first and foremost, to compensate borrowers in a timely manner for the financial harm they suffered from faulty foreclosure practices,” Stipano said.


Representatives of three of the consulting firms that handled the reviews are also expected to testify.


Konrad Alt, a managing director of Promontory Financial Group, which has come under fire for handling a major chunk of the reviews, did not directly address the foreclosure settlement in his written testimony.


He did say that the firm had established hotlines to allow reviewers to anonymously raise concerns about the independence of the reviews.


(Reporting by Emily Stephenson and Aruna Viswanatha; Editing by Leslie Gevirtz)





Reuters: Economic News




Lawmakers lambast Fed, others for hiding behind "trade secrets"