Showing posts with label Merkel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Merkel. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Political Prediction: Merkel Loses Chancellorship in September as Support for AfD Soars

Now that we have an Understanding German Political Parties let’s consider some scenarios from reader Bernd who lives in Germany about how the election on September 22 plays out.

In past elections, as many as 40% of the eligible population did not vote. This brings a very large pool of voters that may turn out for the anti-Euro AfD party.


Bernd comments “All indications show that AfD has a huge potential to convert nonvoters to voters. If election turnout is high, seats in Parliament may look drastically different than today.


For the past two weeks I have been watching the iPhone app Wahl-O-Meter and AfD has risen from 5% of the vote to 6.6% now.



Not only has AfD been rising, but today is the first day I have seen AfD above Die Linke. In the same timeframe, support for FDP has been sinking.


FDP is right on the bubble, polling 5% down from 5.4% or so. It takes 5% of the vote to stay in parliament.


This is significant because FDP currently has the third largest representation in parliament and is the junior partner in Merkel’s existing CDU/CSU/FDP coalition. The very real danger to Merkel is FDP goes to zero percent representation.


In theory CDU, CSU, and SPD could easily form a coalition that totals over 50% of parliament. However, the SPD political party leadership has ruled out a coalition government that includes Merkel as chancellor.


AfD Support Rises to 19% in Handelsblatt Online Poll


Via Google translate, please note 19 percent would vote for the anti-euro party.

The new anti-euro party alternative for Germany (AFD) has a good chance to collect in autumn in the Bundestag. The result of a representative survey of online market research company market research on behalf of Handelsblatt Online. 19.2 percent of the 1,003 respondents affirmed therefore the question of whether they would give the party their vote in the general election (24.9 percent of men and 14.8 percent of women).

54.6 percent of respondents (56.7 percent of men, 53 percent of women) would not choose the AFD on the other hand, 26 percent of respondents stated that they have not made a choice decision (18.4 percent of men, 32.2 percent of women).


Their greatest potential voters, the party in the 46 – to 65-year-olds: 23.1 percent of this age group, the AFD would give their vote (in the 31 – to 45-year-olds: 19.3 percent among 18 – to 30 – year: 14.2 percent).


Online polls are notoriously inaccurate, so the key takeaway is continually rising interest.


A few weeks ago many news agencies were stating AfD would not reach the five percent threshold. Bernd and I think 12% or more is easily achievable.


With that backdrop out of the way, let’s take a look at reader Bernd’s speculative estimates for the September election.


Bernd’s Speculative Estimates


  • CDU/CSU: 36%

  • SPD: 23%

  • Grünen: 13%

  • AfD: 12%

  • Die Linke: 06%      

  • FDP: 04%

  • Piraten: 03%

  • Others: 03%

Should that scenario or any close approximation play out, it will be quite difficult for Merkel to stay in power.


A “natural coalition” between CDU/CSU and AfD could in theory work, and it might not take 50% of the popular vote to form such a coalition on account of the parties losing representation. Yet, even in such scenario, the price to pay for CDU/CSU would likely be Merkel’s chancellorship.


Bernd outlines four possibilities


Four Possibilities


  1. SPD, CDU, CSU form a coalition in which Merkel steps aside or is forced out.

  2. SPD forms a coalition with half term Merkel (CDU) and half term Steinbrück (SPD) as chancellor.

  3. The politics splinters as happened in Italy with unknown effects for the coming government.

  4. CDU/CSU and AfD form a coalition under a new and unknown chancellor. Together they reform EU politics.

Bernd states option four would be ideal but right now such a possibility is wishful thinking as opposed to a strong likelihood.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Political Prediction: Merkel Loses Chancellorship in September as Support for AfD Soars

Friday, April 19, 2013

Merkel Needs Opposition Party Votes to Pass Cyprus Bailout

Germany approved the Cyprus bailout on Thursday as expected. However, Merkel required votes from the SPD and Green Party, to do so.

One might not understand the implications when reading the Wall Street Journal report Germany Approves Cyprus Bailout.

Germany’s parliament on Thursday voted in favor of aid for troubled Cyprus by a large majority, giving Chancellor Angela Merkel’s euro-crisis policies broad backing in the face of opposition criticism ahead of fall elections.

Despite a federal election in Germany just five months away, the ruling coalition led by Ms. Merkel succeeded in convincing coalition lawmakers and the main opposition parties—the Social Democrats and Greens—that the negotiated deal serves German interests, and a rejection would rattle the euro zone and lead to a Cypriot bankruptcy.


“Germany got what it wanted from the bailout,” said Christian Schulz, senior economist at Berenberg Bank.



What vs. How


Merkel may have gotten “what” she wanted. I rather doubt she got it “how” she wanted. Reader Bernd from Germany explains …


“The falling apart of CDU/ CSU and FDP coalition is beginning to show in all seriousness now. If Bundestag needs to vote one more time before the federal elections (i.e. on Slovenia, Spain, France), the Government might not make it.”


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Merkel Needs Opposition Party Votes to Pass Cyprus Bailout

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Is Merkel in "Cloud-Cuckoo Land" or Simply a Hypocrite? How About a Chameleon?

Today my spotlight is not on the implosion in Spain, Portugal, France, Cyprus, or Italy.

Rather, my focus is on a statement made by Paul Krugman that “senior German officials are living in Wolkenkuckucksheim – cloud-cuckoo land.”


Please consider Double Standards: Europeans Are Right to Be Angry with Merkel

Chancellor Angela Merkel has tenaciously insisted that austerity is the only way out of the crisis for ailing EU countries. She doesn’t practice what she preaches in Germany, though, which makes growing anger toward her understandable.

The question is not about whether Krugman is right when he almost obsessively labels Merkel “dim-witted” and writes that “senior German officials are living in Wolkenkuckucksheim — cloud-cuckoo land.”


No, it is not the know-it-alls from abroad who spark doubts. It is Merkel’s own policies here at home that prove the error of the measures she champions for the ailing economies of Southern Europe — and feed the suspicion that the outrage directed at the German taskmaster is wholly justified.


Hypocritical Examples


  1. Merkel insists German deposits are sacrosanct. Cypriot deposits are not.

  2. Merkel insists stimulus measures are out of the question for club-med states, but they were not out of the question for Germany in 2009.

  3. In regards to fiscal stimulus, when the financial crisis threatened Germany, “Merkel allotted €1.5 billion to a car-scrapping bonus plan. More than half a million used cars were crushed by the junk press, and 600,000 new cars were purchased, each of them subsidized by €2,500 in government funds.”

  4. Merkel was a huge supporter of nuclear energy until the German population wasn’t in the aftermath of the nuclear disaster in Japan.

Merkel the Chameleon


Economically speaking, it’s easy enough to make the case that it is Krugman who is in “Cloud-Cuckoo Land” and that Merkel is simply a hypocrite.


However, Merkel is so good at changing the color of her spots, I propose chameleon is an equally good description.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Is Merkel in "Cloud-Cuckoo Land" or Simply a Hypocrite? How About a Chameleon?

Monday, March 25, 2013

Merkel"s Vision: "United States of Germany"

Following brutal negotiations with EU finance ministers, the IMF and various European government officials, Cyprus finally agreed to measures that her highness, Angela Merkel would accept.

This time she held her ground. Previously, Merkel compromised every key position she has ever held in the sake of political expediency.


For example, Merkel went twice went to the well on Greece to appease her opponents. She repeatedly caved in on demands from French president Nicolas Sarkozy. She reversed her stand on nuclear energy following German polls.


So why did Merkel drew the line at Cyprus?


To Merkel everything is a play to win the next election and ultimately to preserve her legacy. She is willing to play hardball now for one reason only. Public opinion is decisively against further bailouts, and anything but exceptionally harsh terms on Cyprus would hurt her election chances in September.


She fears the rise of the eurosceptic Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party and the best way to take some wind out of the AfD sails is to show she cares about austerity.


Merkel’s Vision


Merkel’s vision is not a United States of Europe. Rather, Merkel’s vision is for a “United States of Germany”. She would sell her soul to obtain that legacy. In this light, every move she has made makes perfect “political” sense, solidarity be damned.


That Cyprus and Greece were ruined in the process is acceptable “collateral damage”. If Spain is not careful, it will become the next “collateral damage”.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Merkel"s Vision: "United States of Germany"

Friday, March 22, 2013

Merkel ally says Cyprus "playing with fire"



BERLIN, March 22 | Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:25am EDT



BERLIN, March 22 (Reuters) – A leading conservative ally of German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Friday that Cyprus was “playing with fire” and needed to come up with a workable proposal for plugging a multi-billion-euro financing gap urgently.


Volker Kauder, leader of the ruling Christian Democrats (CDU) in parliament, also rejected the suggestion that Cyprus might nationalise pension funds of semi-public companies to fill the hole, saying this was a worse solution than hitting small savers in the Mediterranean island’s banks.


“I don’t think this can happen, because this would be huge for pensioners, for the small people. So I don’t think this is a proposal that helps,” Kauder told public television station ARD.


“If a proposal comes, I am optimistic. But we aren’t there yet,” he added. “I still believe we will get a settlement, but Cyprus is playing with fire.”



Reuters: Financial Services and Real Estate




Merkel ally says Cyprus "playing with fire"

Merkel ally says Cyprus "playing with fire"



BERLIN, March 22 | Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:25am EDT



BERLIN, March 22 (Reuters) – A leading conservative ally of German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Friday that Cyprus was “playing with fire” and needed to come up with a workable proposal for plugging a multi-billion-euro financing gap urgently.


Volker Kauder, leader of the ruling Christian Democrats (CDU) in parliament, also rejected the suggestion that Cyprus might nationalise pension funds of semi-public companies to fill the hole, saying this was a worse solution than hitting small savers in the Mediterranean island’s banks.


“I don’t think this can happen, because this would be huge for pensioners, for the small people. So I don’t think this is a proposal that helps,” Kauder told public television station ARD.


“If a proposal comes, I am optimistic. But we aren’t there yet,” he added. “I still believe we will get a settlement, but Cyprus is playing with fire.”



Reuters: Bonds News




Merkel ally says Cyprus "playing with fire"

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Merkel Coalition Doomed; Italy Exit Only a Matter of Time?

About a week ago I started exchanging emails with reader Bernd who lives in Germany. He claims that the anti-euro movement in Germany is far bigger than mainstream media lets on.

The question is who to believe, and I cast my lot with Bernd.


I have been down this path twice before, the first with reader “AC” who is from Italy and called the rise of Beppe Grillo a year before mainstream media ever mentioned the guy, let alone treated him seriously.


The second setup regards reader “Bran” who lives in Spain. Bran sends me most of the Spanish links that I translate.


Currently I am 2-for-2 on who to believe.


Nonetheless, let’s first consider the other side of the story as presented in Tuesday’s Eurointelligence  report offering the following comments on a recent German poll that shows 26% of Germans would back anti euro-party.

We want to caution readers not to translate the survey result by TNS-Emnid, according to which 26% of Germans would consider backing an anti-euro party, with the likely results to be achieved by the party that established itself this week – the “Alternative für Deutschland“, run by a group German professors and journalists. The TNS-Emnid polls also shows that the support for an anti-euro party among 40-49 year old is around 40%.

Reuters quotes Emnid chief Klaus-Peter Schoeppner saying an anti-euro party would only gain about 2 or 3% – as most of the anti-Europeans see themselves well catered for by the CDU and the FDP.


That’s our view as well. You already have plenty of true Eurosceptic parties in Germany. So why bother?


Why Bother? Really?


Eurointelligence thinks  the “Alternative für Deutschland“ AfD party will only get 3% of the vote because there are plenty of “true Eurosceptic parties in Germany”.


Really?


Let’s tune in to reader Bernd who writes ….

Currently Germany has 6 Parties in Federal Parliament: CDU, CSU, FDP, SPD, Green Party (Grüne), Left Party (Die Linke).

The current Government is made up of CDU/CSU/FDP under Chancellor Merkel.


CDU, CSU, FDP, SPD, and the Green Party are basically all promoting the same program, a mainstream nanny state agenda which is typical for Europe and for Germany. Their main thrust is towards a centralization of power in Europe to the detriment of the Germany, with the Euro being the conduit.


They seek to relinquish as much power to Brussels as possible as fast as possible. They are using the crisis of the Euro to bring this about. All these parties have voted for ESF and ESM with an overwhelming majority. Bailing out banks is also very highly on their agenda and is not up for discussion.


The parties differ in minor points. While SPD and Grüne promote an immediate introduction of Eurobonds with a complete disregard of the Maastricht Agreement, CDU/CSU/FDP promote a slower integration, with a possible return to the Maastricht Agreement and the no bail out clause, after the crisis is over.


The Left Party is against bailing out the banks, but otherwise they have a pure socialist agenda, coupled with a complete withdrawal of the German Army from all foreign activities. They also promote European Integration, even faster than the rest.


At this moment the German voter has absolutely no chance to voice his displeasure with the Euro/EU politics and policies. There is simply no party and no candidate with a program to reflect his desire.


49% of German voters are very displeased about current EU policies and about the pro Euro stand of our Government.


The new Party (AfD = Alternative für Deutschland), which is currently under formation will need 2000 signatures in each State of Germany to be admitted for the coming elections. This will not be a problem at all.


AfD has a clear program, but far beyond a single issue. The main point is a return to Maastricht, to “no bail out” and to the creation of a mechanism to exit the Euro in a legal and orderly fashion for all Eurozone members. It’s agenda also includes a clear position against lobbyists, the introduction of popular votes for major issues, and a popular vote for further integration into the EU.


The latest Emnid poll shows that 26% of voters are prepared to consider the new party and its program. Emnid is a very highly regarded and well reputed polling agency. It is almost certain – under these current circumstances – that AfD will be in the next Parliament with 10% of votes or so, if not much higher.


I still expect CDU/CSU to be the strongest single party. However, they will not be able to muster a majority with their current coalition partner FDP. FDP is actually in serious danger to fall below the 5% barrier. Current polls see them at 3%.


CDU/CSU will try to form a coalition with SPD, who might still come in second. SPD says that a coalition with CDU cannot be possible under Merkel’s leadership.


CDU/CSU might also try to form a coalition with the Green Party, who have not put up such a demand. However, I doubt that CDU/CSU/Green Party will have a majority.


More likely is a coalition of SPD/Green Party and Linke, however that coalition probably has too slim a majority to be stable.


All things considered, it will be very difficult to form a stable Government in Germany next time around. AfD has no power to form a coalition, but they may have the power to block a pro-Euro walk through by the other parties.


Throughout Merkel’s career she has changed her opinion on many major matters at will. The one and only thing she stands for is the Euro and further European integration, but this go around that position is going to cost her votes. If CDU/CSU see a rise of the AfD with a serious number of voters largely from their pool of votes, you will see an anti-Merkel movement even inside CDU/CSU.


Expect unrest in the party prior to elections if polls in favor of AfD show any major support.


I think Merkel is in serious danger to not be the next chancellor. And yes, I think you could be the first to carefully speculate along those lines!


Best wishes
Bernd


Underestimating Backlash


Bernd’s scenario sounds quite plausible to me, just as I believed “AC” regarding the rise of Beppe Grillo.


I asked Bernd for comments on the above Eurointelligence piece and he replied …


“For Reuters to quote Emnid pollster Schoeppner with a statement that most anti-Euro Germans feel well catered for by CDU or FDP is outright unbelieveable. I doubt that quote is true, because it makes absolutely no sense at all. There is no indication that CDU or FDP has any room left for anti-Euro types.”

Attempt to Stifle Discussion


In another email, Bernd offered these thoughts on “Alternative für Deutschland“

Mainstream media will do anything in their power to keep AfD out of any public discussion. Should that strategy not work, the media may spin a Neo-Nazi accusation which traditionally would be the death of any new party. However, the excellent names of the founders, and the fact that many of them are former CDU or FDP members makes that tactic highly risky.

In Germany, due to our history, you cannot win on a platform like Wilders in Holland or the Nationalists in Finland. AfD must always walk a fine line, never openly promoting a “Germany go it alone” strategy, or worse a “we know better” strategy. Change must be brought about in a civilized and democratic fashion. If they manage that, they will be fine. A mighty task ahead!


Four Time Bombs of the Chancellor


Via Google translate from Der Spiegel, Wolfgang Münchau writes Euro crisis: The four time bombs of the Chancellor

Until recently, everything went like clockwork for the Chancellor. ECB chief Mario Draghi had the euro crisis put an apparent end last summer – the purchase of government bonds calmed the markets. Merkel recommended Draghi as the savior of the euro.

The crisis is not yet returned to its full extent, but since the election in Italy, optimism has faded. We’re back at one of these dangerous turning points. I see four possible developments  before the election that can be dangerous.


The greatest danger is currently out of Italy. The country is in a worsening recession and is paralyzed by a political crisis . To survive in the euro, Italy needs internal reforms and external concessions that Germany rejects. After my conversations there in the past week, the only hope for a modern and stable governments in the next five years in a generation change at the top of both major parties. The Partito Democratico is torn. Party leader Pier Luigi Bersani , who is now trying desperately to form a government, and his young challenger Matteo Renzi, Mayor of Florence, are bitter rivals. Between the two there is a gap of about two generations.


A euro exit of Italy only a matter of time?


There is a small chance that this generation succeed. Likely from today’s perspective, however, is a new, non-democratically elected government of technocrats that will strengthen the radical forces in the medium term. In this scenario, it would amount to an absolute majority of Beppe Grillo’s to anti-establishment movement. My interlocutors in Italy consider this scenario now for the more probable. Whether it actually comes to the promised referendum on the euro, is not clear. But it’s not really important. From the current recession would mean a depression, because who is already investing in Grillo In this scenario, a euro exit would be Italy’s only a matter of time. …..


The fourth risk for Merkel is the incumbent in this week’s anti-euro party . I can see its not to the Bundestag, but certainly the possibility of success respect, the Union may cost valuable votes. The experience of the euro crisis shows that everywhere, even in Germany, a breeding ground for protest movements arose. And thus also the elections are unpredictable.


My forecast is that Merkel on Euro will fail politically. The question for me is only if this is done before the election or sometime thereafter.


Quite a Change


That is one hell of a change for Wolfgang Münchau who was optimistic about the Case for a grand coalition in Italy following the election.

I am aware that almost every Italian political expert says this is not possible because of the confrontational style of politics and dozens of other reasons. I respectfully disagree. Italian parties have no experiences of a grand coalition, so much is true. Then again, the German politicians who entered grand coalitions in 1967 or 2005 did not either. Grand coalitions are certainly not a good way to govern countries over long periods because they leave radical fringe parties thriving in opposition. A grand coalition would leave Mr Grillo as the effective leader of the opposition. But grand coalitions can work well for a finite, predefined period, say for one parliamentary term.

Münchau is co-founder and president of Eurointelligence which makes the Eurointelligence comment “You already have plenty of true Eurosceptic parties in Germany. So why bother?” all the more peculiar.


If I am not mistaken (but I cannot find the reference) Münchau was not worried about Beppe Grillo before the election.


Regardless, Münchau is now thinking clearly about the setup in Germany and Italy (in terms of what is likely), even though he objects to the idea.


The best hope now is to get everyone on board for a peaceful dismantling of this doomed-from-the-beginning experiment, or it is going to splinter in a dozen pieces in the worst possible way at the worst possible time.


Wine Country Conference


I am hosting an economic conference on April 5 in Sonoma, California. Proceeds go to the Les Turner ALS Foundation (Lou Gehrig’s Disease).


Please see My Wife Joanne Has Passed Away; Stop and Smell the Lilacs for my association with the disease.


To learn about the economic conference with world-class speakers including John Hussman, Michael Pettis, Jim Chanos, John Mauldin, Mike “Mish” Shedlock, Chris Martenson with guest moderator Lauren Lyster and other Special Guests, please visit Wine Country Conference April 5, 2013


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Merkel Coalition Doomed; Italy Exit Only a Matter of Time?