Showing posts with label Matter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matter. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

INSIGHT-Pakistan"s booming market no black and white matter




Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:59am EDT



* Karachi market one of world’s best performers


* Has become a Frontier Market discovery trade


* But critics say market manipulations are rife


* “Black money” amnesty also boosts market


By Katharine Houreld


KARACHI, April 10 (Reuters) – Pakistan’s chaotic financial heart is home to 18 million people, Taliban bombers, contract killers – and one of the world’s most successful stock markets.


With 49 percent returns in 2012, the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) was one of the five best performing markets in the world. Now it is seeking a foreign partner to buy a stake and take over management of a market that has risen three-fold over the past four years.


At least some of that performance came on the back of a government amnesty that allowed people holding undeclared assets or “black money” to invest it freely in the market. And the relatively illiquid market has also been vulnerable to manipulation.


But government officials say the market’s success highlights the economic potential of a country better known for spiraling sectarian violence, the war against al Qaeda and the Taliban, crippling power cuts and entrenched corruption.


The market’s benchmark index continues to soar to record highs — up 10.34 percent year to date — fueled in part by expectations May elections will mark Pakistan’s first transfer of power from one democratic government to another. For foreigners, an 11 percent depreciation of the Pakistani rupee against the dollar since the start of the year has offset those gains.


“Pakistan has a lot to offer investors and this is our chance to show it,” said Nadeem Naqvi, the KSE chairman. He plans to embark on a series of roadshows for potential foreign partners that will take him to London, Frankfurt and Hong Kong in the coming months.


Many of the companies listed on the KSE offer double-digit returns, low stock prices and resilient business models in this frontier market with a population of 180 million. The index still has an attractive price/earnings ratio of $ 8.50 despite the soaring returns of the past few years.


Pakistan now has a 4 percent weighting in the MSCI Frontiers Market Index and has become somewhat of a discovery for foreign investors chasing new markets and yields.


THE SEAMIER SIDE


But the KSE’s spectacular rise last year can at least be partly attributed to another factor entirely – the cleansing of “black money”.


The market took off last year just as a government decree was finalized allowing people to buy stocks with no questions asked about the source of the cash. Average daily volume more than doubled last year to 173 million shares from 79 million in 2011.


Authorities say the measure will bring undocumented funds into the tax net in a country where few pay taxes. But some critics decried it as a gift to corrupt officials and criminals seeking to launder dirty cash.


“Politics and dirty money go hand in hand in Pakistan,” said Dr. Ikramul Haq, a Supreme Court lawyer and a professor on tax law.


“People want to be outside the regulatory framework and outside the tax net.”


The black money amnesty also drew attention to the seamier side of the Karachi stock market. Interviews with regulators, brokers, market officials and analysts showed insider trading and other manipulations are routine. Regulators have been largely ineffectual in controlling the shady practices.


The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) said it found 23 violations of securities laws that merited fines in fiscal year 2011-12 (April/March). The market regulator sent warning letters in another 19 cases, it said in its annual report. ()


That’s a drop in the bucket, says Ashraf Tiwana, dismissed as head of SECP’s legal department after years of clashes with his bosses over fraud in the market. He has petitioned the Supreme Court to replace the SECP chairman and commissioners.


“There’s a lot of fraud, a lot of market manipulation … but not enough action has been taken, especially not enough criminal action has been taken,” Tiwana told Reuters. “They’re just passing small fines and giving out warning letters.”


Regulators are too close to the market, Tiwana said. The head of the stock exchange is a former broker and the two top members of the SECP are former employees of Aqeel Karim Dhedhi, founder of one of the country’s biggest brokerage houses.


BIG DHEDHI


Nicknamed “Big Dhedhi” for his ability to move markets, Aqeel Karim Dhedhi heads one of Pakistan’s largest domestic conglomerates, the AKD Group.


Lately, the well-known philanthropist and leading member of Pakistan’s business establishment has been trying to fend off arrest over allegations of insider trading.


An SECP investigator accused traders, including Dhedhi’s brokerage, of buying shares in a state-run Sui Southern Gas Co before an official announcement allowing the company to raise its prices. In the weeks before Sui Southern’s announcement, the stock price jumped from 13.5 rupees to 20 rupees, its biggest hike in five years.


The National Accountability Bureau, the state-run anti-corruption agency, called it a case of insider trading. But the SECP said its own confidential investigation showed no evidence of fraud. The SECP whistleblower in the case has been suspended from her job for disclosing “confidential information”.


Dhedhi strongly denied any wrongdoing and said he purchased his gas stocks years before the announcement.


“There is nothing there. The (SECP) report totally cleared us,” said Dhedhi, a burly man wearing a traditional long cotton shirt and baggy pants. “I’m proud to say that in more than 40 years of operating, we’ve never paid a penny in fines.”


Dhedhi says he often offers advice to government officials on financial policy. His business empire includes two equity funds that were among the best performing in Asia in 2012.


“The SECP has really started listening to the market,” Dhedhi said, a suited executive acting as translator.


REVOLVING DOOR


Dhedhi remains under investigation. But even if regulators were to find him guilty of insider trading, past practice shows he would likely get a slap on the wrist. The SECP’s fines are almost always a fraction above the amount of money made in the stock manipulation, and sometimes even less.


In December, a broker was fined half the amount he made from trades that manipulated the share price of tobacco giant Philip Morris. In February, the SECP fined Pakistani brokerage BMA Capital $ 500,000 – after it made $ 460,000 by misleading a foreign client. BMA Capital has appealed.


Imtiaz Haider, the SECP commissioner in charge of market regulation, acknowledged fines were largely symbolic. If they were too high, he said, brokers might not be willing to pay them. Contesting fines in the congested court system could take years.


“The purpose is more to name and shame,” Haider said in an interview. “It causes them reputational damage.”


Like KSE Chairman Nadeem Naqvi, Haider is a former employee of Dhedhi’s. Both men denied any conflict of interest.


“It’s important to have people in charge who know the way markets work,” Haider said. “I’ve had lots of other jobs than just working for Dhedhi.”


The SECP can revoke licenses, impose hefty fines, or open criminal cases against offenders. But it almost never does. It has launched only 10 criminal cases in the past five years – all still held up in the judicial backlog. It has issued dozens of small fines.


“We have great laws and regulations but they are not properly enforced,” said Khalid Mirza, a former SECP chief. “The SECP is just catching the small fish as far as I can see.”


Naqvi, the KSE head, acknowledged his priority has been to boost the market, not to crack down on it.


“My management style isn’t confrontational because I want to build confidence in the market,” he said.


Separating the commercial and the regulatory functions of the market is one of the main reasons the KSE is looking for a foreign partner. It has appointed Deutsche Bank as its advisor on its quest to demutualise – a process that will separate those two functions.


“Demutualisation is another step on the road to reform,” Naqvi said. “Right now we have a fairly robust system. But I’m not saying its foolproof.”


BLACK TO WHITE


The Karachi market’s small size and lack of liquidity make it vulnerable to manipulation. Market capitalization is only $ 41.5 billion – the Bombay stock market’s capitalisation is more than 10 times higher at $ 578 billion.


Only a quarter of the shares are freely floated – about 30 percent of that is held by foreign funds and investors, including Franklin Templeton, Invesco Ltd, Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Mackenzie Financial Corporation.


Since only 60 of KSE’s 600 listed companies trade regularly, small trades can rapidly make a big difference in a company’s share price.


Boosting volumes on the exchange was one of the intentions behind Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari’s decree last April turning black money into white.


It said no questions could be asked by the Federal Board of Revenue about the source of funds invested in stocks till July 2014. The investments become legally legitimate.


The pool of such funds is potentially huge. A report by the United Nations Office on Drug and Crime projected the size of Pakistan’s informal or “black” economy at $ 34 billion in 2010-11, one-fifth of the formal economy.


The Paris-based Financial Action Task Force, which monitors money laundering, said the decree did not contravene Pakistan’s existing anti-money laundering legislation. But anecdotal evidence suggests controls are lax.


In one case shown to Reuters by a lawyer, a man invested $ 10 million buying stocks in a single transaction. His address: a Karachi slum notorious for Taliban infiltration.





Reuters: Financial Services and Real Estate




INSIGHT-Pakistan"s booming market no black and white matter

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Merkel Coalition Doomed; Italy Exit Only a Matter of Time?

About a week ago I started exchanging emails with reader Bernd who lives in Germany. He claims that the anti-euro movement in Germany is far bigger than mainstream media lets on.

The question is who to believe, and I cast my lot with Bernd.


I have been down this path twice before, the first with reader “AC” who is from Italy and called the rise of Beppe Grillo a year before mainstream media ever mentioned the guy, let alone treated him seriously.


The second setup regards reader “Bran” who lives in Spain. Bran sends me most of the Spanish links that I translate.


Currently I am 2-for-2 on who to believe.


Nonetheless, let’s first consider the other side of the story as presented in Tuesday’s Eurointelligence  report offering the following comments on a recent German poll that shows 26% of Germans would back anti euro-party.

We want to caution readers not to translate the survey result by TNS-Emnid, according to which 26% of Germans would consider backing an anti-euro party, with the likely results to be achieved by the party that established itself this week – the “Alternative für Deutschland“, run by a group German professors and journalists. The TNS-Emnid polls also shows that the support for an anti-euro party among 40-49 year old is around 40%.

Reuters quotes Emnid chief Klaus-Peter Schoeppner saying an anti-euro party would only gain about 2 or 3% – as most of the anti-Europeans see themselves well catered for by the CDU and the FDP.


That’s our view as well. You already have plenty of true Eurosceptic parties in Germany. So why bother?


Why Bother? Really?


Eurointelligence thinks  the “Alternative für Deutschland“ AfD party will only get 3% of the vote because there are plenty of “true Eurosceptic parties in Germany”.


Really?


Let’s tune in to reader Bernd who writes ….

Currently Germany has 6 Parties in Federal Parliament: CDU, CSU, FDP, SPD, Green Party (Grüne), Left Party (Die Linke).

The current Government is made up of CDU/CSU/FDP under Chancellor Merkel.


CDU, CSU, FDP, SPD, and the Green Party are basically all promoting the same program, a mainstream nanny state agenda which is typical for Europe and for Germany. Their main thrust is towards a centralization of power in Europe to the detriment of the Germany, with the Euro being the conduit.


They seek to relinquish as much power to Brussels as possible as fast as possible. They are using the crisis of the Euro to bring this about. All these parties have voted for ESF and ESM with an overwhelming majority. Bailing out banks is also very highly on their agenda and is not up for discussion.


The parties differ in minor points. While SPD and Grüne promote an immediate introduction of Eurobonds with a complete disregard of the Maastricht Agreement, CDU/CSU/FDP promote a slower integration, with a possible return to the Maastricht Agreement and the no bail out clause, after the crisis is over.


The Left Party is against bailing out the banks, but otherwise they have a pure socialist agenda, coupled with a complete withdrawal of the German Army from all foreign activities. They also promote European Integration, even faster than the rest.


At this moment the German voter has absolutely no chance to voice his displeasure with the Euro/EU politics and policies. There is simply no party and no candidate with a program to reflect his desire.


49% of German voters are very displeased about current EU policies and about the pro Euro stand of our Government.


The new Party (AfD = Alternative für Deutschland), which is currently under formation will need 2000 signatures in each State of Germany to be admitted for the coming elections. This will not be a problem at all.


AfD has a clear program, but far beyond a single issue. The main point is a return to Maastricht, to “no bail out” and to the creation of a mechanism to exit the Euro in a legal and orderly fashion for all Eurozone members. It’s agenda also includes a clear position against lobbyists, the introduction of popular votes for major issues, and a popular vote for further integration into the EU.


The latest Emnid poll shows that 26% of voters are prepared to consider the new party and its program. Emnid is a very highly regarded and well reputed polling agency. It is almost certain – under these current circumstances – that AfD will be in the next Parliament with 10% of votes or so, if not much higher.


I still expect CDU/CSU to be the strongest single party. However, they will not be able to muster a majority with their current coalition partner FDP. FDP is actually in serious danger to fall below the 5% barrier. Current polls see them at 3%.


CDU/CSU will try to form a coalition with SPD, who might still come in second. SPD says that a coalition with CDU cannot be possible under Merkel’s leadership.


CDU/CSU might also try to form a coalition with the Green Party, who have not put up such a demand. However, I doubt that CDU/CSU/Green Party will have a majority.


More likely is a coalition of SPD/Green Party and Linke, however that coalition probably has too slim a majority to be stable.


All things considered, it will be very difficult to form a stable Government in Germany next time around. AfD has no power to form a coalition, but they may have the power to block a pro-Euro walk through by the other parties.


Throughout Merkel’s career she has changed her opinion on many major matters at will. The one and only thing she stands for is the Euro and further European integration, but this go around that position is going to cost her votes. If CDU/CSU see a rise of the AfD with a serious number of voters largely from their pool of votes, you will see an anti-Merkel movement even inside CDU/CSU.


Expect unrest in the party prior to elections if polls in favor of AfD show any major support.


I think Merkel is in serious danger to not be the next chancellor. And yes, I think you could be the first to carefully speculate along those lines!


Best wishes
Bernd


Underestimating Backlash


Bernd’s scenario sounds quite plausible to me, just as I believed “AC” regarding the rise of Beppe Grillo.


I asked Bernd for comments on the above Eurointelligence piece and he replied …


“For Reuters to quote Emnid pollster Schoeppner with a statement that most anti-Euro Germans feel well catered for by CDU or FDP is outright unbelieveable. I doubt that quote is true, because it makes absolutely no sense at all. There is no indication that CDU or FDP has any room left for anti-Euro types.”

Attempt to Stifle Discussion


In another email, Bernd offered these thoughts on “Alternative für Deutschland“

Mainstream media will do anything in their power to keep AfD out of any public discussion. Should that strategy not work, the media may spin a Neo-Nazi accusation which traditionally would be the death of any new party. However, the excellent names of the founders, and the fact that many of them are former CDU or FDP members makes that tactic highly risky.

In Germany, due to our history, you cannot win on a platform like Wilders in Holland or the Nationalists in Finland. AfD must always walk a fine line, never openly promoting a “Germany go it alone” strategy, or worse a “we know better” strategy. Change must be brought about in a civilized and democratic fashion. If they manage that, they will be fine. A mighty task ahead!


Four Time Bombs of the Chancellor


Via Google translate from Der Spiegel, Wolfgang Münchau writes Euro crisis: The four time bombs of the Chancellor

Until recently, everything went like clockwork for the Chancellor. ECB chief Mario Draghi had the euro crisis put an apparent end last summer – the purchase of government bonds calmed the markets. Merkel recommended Draghi as the savior of the euro.

The crisis is not yet returned to its full extent, but since the election in Italy, optimism has faded. We’re back at one of these dangerous turning points. I see four possible developments  before the election that can be dangerous.


The greatest danger is currently out of Italy. The country is in a worsening recession and is paralyzed by a political crisis . To survive in the euro, Italy needs internal reforms and external concessions that Germany rejects. After my conversations there in the past week, the only hope for a modern and stable governments in the next five years in a generation change at the top of both major parties. The Partito Democratico is torn. Party leader Pier Luigi Bersani , who is now trying desperately to form a government, and his young challenger Matteo Renzi, Mayor of Florence, are bitter rivals. Between the two there is a gap of about two generations.


A euro exit of Italy only a matter of time?


There is a small chance that this generation succeed. Likely from today’s perspective, however, is a new, non-democratically elected government of technocrats that will strengthen the radical forces in the medium term. In this scenario, it would amount to an absolute majority of Beppe Grillo’s to anti-establishment movement. My interlocutors in Italy consider this scenario now for the more probable. Whether it actually comes to the promised referendum on the euro, is not clear. But it’s not really important. From the current recession would mean a depression, because who is already investing in Grillo In this scenario, a euro exit would be Italy’s only a matter of time. …..


The fourth risk for Merkel is the incumbent in this week’s anti-euro party . I can see its not to the Bundestag, but certainly the possibility of success respect, the Union may cost valuable votes. The experience of the euro crisis shows that everywhere, even in Germany, a breeding ground for protest movements arose. And thus also the elections are unpredictable.


My forecast is that Merkel on Euro will fail politically. The question for me is only if this is done before the election or sometime thereafter.


Quite a Change


That is one hell of a change for Wolfgang Münchau who was optimistic about the Case for a grand coalition in Italy following the election.

I am aware that almost every Italian political expert says this is not possible because of the confrontational style of politics and dozens of other reasons. I respectfully disagree. Italian parties have no experiences of a grand coalition, so much is true. Then again, the German politicians who entered grand coalitions in 1967 or 2005 did not either. Grand coalitions are certainly not a good way to govern countries over long periods because they leave radical fringe parties thriving in opposition. A grand coalition would leave Mr Grillo as the effective leader of the opposition. But grand coalitions can work well for a finite, predefined period, say for one parliamentary term.

Münchau is co-founder and president of Eurointelligence which makes the Eurointelligence comment “You already have plenty of true Eurosceptic parties in Germany. So why bother?” all the more peculiar.


If I am not mistaken (but I cannot find the reference) Münchau was not worried about Beppe Grillo before the election.


Regardless, Münchau is now thinking clearly about the setup in Germany and Italy (in terms of what is likely), even though he objects to the idea.


The best hope now is to get everyone on board for a peaceful dismantling of this doomed-from-the-beginning experiment, or it is going to splinter in a dozen pieces in the worst possible way at the worst possible time.


Wine Country Conference


I am hosting an economic conference on April 5 in Sonoma, California. Proceeds go to the Les Turner ALS Foundation (Lou Gehrig’s Disease).


Please see My Wife Joanne Has Passed Away; Stop and Smell the Lilacs for my association with the disease.


To learn about the economic conference with world-class speakers including John Hussman, Michael Pettis, Jim Chanos, John Mauldin, Mike “Mish” Shedlock, Chris Martenson with guest moderator Lauren Lyster and other Special Guests, please visit Wine Country Conference April 5, 2013


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Merkel Coalition Doomed; Italy Exit Only a Matter of Time?

Friday, February 22, 2013

Dow 20,000 Only a Matter of Time

By EconMatters

 

 

Dow Record in sight

 

We are 200 points from breaking a new high in the Dow Industrials which got me looking back at assets over the last 25 years in relation to the value of the US Dollar Index and the overall money supply. 

 

25 years in Markets

 

Some of the best performing assets are the stock market and gasoline with bonds and housing putting in steady gains. Of course with all assets you get a whole lot more bang for your buck if you happen to time the market correctly. And assets like Stocks, Housing and Gasoline all have crash periods where Dow components go bankrupt and are replaced, homeowners lose their homes, and in the financial crash any Gasoline investor would have been forced out of the market. 

 

Need to be Invested

 

But make no mistake the long-term trend is that you want to be invested in something that appreciates in value, you can get out of it if you need to as in liquid, and is going to be attractive to other investors over the long haul. But you have to be invested to take advantage of the trend of the growing money supply, currency in circulation, printing press phenomenon that ultimately underlies all asset values. 

 

Your Grandpa was on to something

 

Whether it is the price of a car, a new house, the price of gasoline, a movie ticket, or a good stock there is going to be more money created each year chasing these assets in the system.  This represents the phenomenon of “when I was a kid a coke cost a nickel” or you could buy a home or a vehicle in the 1950`s for prices that are unrecognizable today. 

 

Dow 20,000 only a matter of time

 

In looking back at history of markets, if we take the Dow Industrials, there is no doubt we are going to blow past Dow 15,000, 16,000, 17,000 and so on based upon currency creation effects alone. The fact that markets are liquid, capital will flow in and out, there will be major pullbacks, those who fail to market time will get crushed at times, but make no mistake Dow 20,000 is a foregone conclusion.

 

If we filter out the noise, and it is considerable at times, the unmistakable point is that most assets appreciate over time. The last 25 years show quite clearly in Gold, Lean Hogs, Real Estate, Stocks and Energy the benefit of being invested, especially in relation to the ever-present growing money supply in the economy.

 

I would say that if the economy cooperates even modestly over the next three years that the Dow 20,000 milestone will be reached. For how soon we get there will depend upon other variables for sure, but watch how the market performs once we break through the 14,200 level, and start putting in new highs in the other indexes. The pace can really take off once markets are in unchartered territory, and we can start taking 1000 point monthly clips that will leave you speechless. 

 

 

And of course Dow 20,000 isn`t going to happen without some pain along the way, but make no mistake it will happen, and it is closer than you think! We are on the verge of taking that next leg up in the Dow, in fact, we should set a new high pretty soon; enjoy the ride as this breakout has been a long time coming.  

 

 

© EconMatters All Rights Reserved | Facebook | Twitter | Post Alert | Kindle




Zero Hedge


Dow 20,000 Only a Matter of Time