Showing posts with label didn't. Show all posts
Showing posts with label didn't. Show all posts

Friday, April 5, 2013

Oh no she didn"t! Advice on "Working with Bitches"

Dominance displays, posturing, submissive behavior — sound like anything you’ve seen at the office? Psychologist Meredith Fuller specializes in a certain subset of these behaviors — usually exhibited by women — behaviors we all know rather well. Cattiness. Dismissive, snide remarks. Cliques and talking behind people’s backs. Most of us associate this kind of stuff with high school, but it doesn’t end there.  It can make your life miserable at work. Fuller’s written a new book about this with the eye-catching title of “Working with Bitches.”


Fuller says she chose to use the word “bitch” in her book title for two reasons. First, everybody knows what you mean when you say ‘I work with a bitch.’ And second, the “new bitch” is fun and can be a positive thing. She says there’s nothing wrong with a woman who is assertive and tough in the workplace, but she wrote her book for more polite, concerned, earnest women who need a way to deal with the sort of behaviors that are more manipulative and cunning.


Fuller identifies eight different types of so-called office mean girls at work (find out about the different types of bitches and what you can do about them by clicking on the photo above).  She says low self-esteem is the reason some women engage in these devious behaviors.


“For a lot of us, we’ve got fears, anxieties, depressions, worries and we mask that. So a lot of the bitchy behavior is because [bitches] don’t know how to feel good enough and so they’re relying on these covert behaviors. But there’s always something they want. For example, that micro-managing boss who’s always saying this isn’t good enough, do it again, slashing with a red pen — often it’s their anxiety and they feel they’re going to mess up. They look at you and if you’re not very neat, that just screams terror for them that something will go wrong. And they’re worried that they’re not in control. The more they feel in control, the less they have to hassle you,” says Fuller. “So give them those updates before they ask, make your desk look neat every time they go back. That helps bring down their anxiety. It’s working at what is driving their behavior underneath what they’re showing you and try and resolve that for them so they don’t need to have that unconscious nastiness triggered.”


Men also exhibit alienating behaviors — like lying, narcissism or exclusion. But they are much more overt than women. To some men, engaging in manipulative behavior can almost seem like a game.


“We all engage in behavior to get a need met, but often what you notice is that it’s more subtle with women. It’s harder to read them,” says Fuller. “Women are more selective and are more able to play it so subtly with several mutterings and nonverbal behavior that a lot of the men don’t necessarily engage in. It’s more like it is what it is with a lot of men.”


Part of the issue with some women in the workplace is they have a desire to be liked whereas men are more likely to want to be feared at work.


“We’ve got mixed motivations [at work] and I think that’s what we pick up. What we’ve noticed is that historically women have felt they need to be more sly, surreptitious, cunning, manipulative and that’s what they’ve been rewarded for,” says Fuller. “What I really like, a lot of the young people we’re getting through — the more Gen Y’s — they’re actually saying, ‘Oh blow all of this. Let me be who I am and part of me is a range of behaviors.’ And that also allows men to have their range of behaviors.”


Fuller says she’s starting to see a massive paradigm shift where a lot of the old, rigid structures are beginning to be broken down. But we’re still in a period where bitchy behavior is something some workers have to cope with.


Latest Stories on Marketplace.org




Oh no she didn"t! Advice on "Working with Bitches"

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

What Bernanke Didn"t Say About Housing (And Everything Else); Bernanke"s Ploy

Caroline Baum had some interesting comments about Bernanke’s testimony before Congress in her writeup What Bernanke Didn’t Say About Housing.

One of the more interesting exchanges at Ben Bernanke’s testimony to the Financial Services Committee today was the one between the Federal Reserve chairman and Representative Scott Garrett, a Republican from New Jersey.
    
Citing Bernanke’s assertion that one of the benefits of QE had been the rise in home prices, Garrett said the following: “Previously you have said that the Fed’s monetary policy actions earlier this decade, 2003 to 2005, did not contribute to the housing bubble in the U.S. So which is it? Is monetary policy by the Fed not a cause of inflationary prices of housing, as you said in the past? Or is it a cause of inflating prices of housing? Can you have it both ways?”

“Yes,” Bernanke said, much to Garrett’s surprise. The increase in home prices now is justified by the low level of mortgage rates, he said. On the other hand, those rates averaged 6 percent in the early part of the last decade and “can’t explain why house prices rose as much as they did.”
    
What he didn’t say was that the percentage of adjustable- rate mortgages soared to a record 37 percent of total mortgage volume in 2005. From mid-2003 to mid-2006, ARM volume averaged 30 percent. The interest rate on ARMs is priced off the Fed’s overnight rate. It was this type of loan that witnessed the most egregious underwriting abuses and the highest delinquency and foreclosure rates. Garrett 1, Bernanke 0. ….

Bernanke’s Ploy

Bernanke’s ploy (as with every central banker) is to absolve themselves of blame for the problems they inevitably cause. Earlier I noted an exchange between Bernanke and Elizabeth Warren that caught Bernanke off guard (see Elizabeth Warren Grills Bernanke on “Too Big to Fail” Policy).

Baum mentioned another one above, and I have a third below.

Sparks Fly: Bernanke Asked to Cut the “Ton of Fat”

Please consider this interesting video between Representative Sean Duffy, a Republican from Wisconsin, confronts Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke about cutting the `fat’ in the budget.

Link if video does not play Sparks Fly: Bernanke Asked to Cut the “Ton of Fat”

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis


What Bernanke Didn"t Say About Housing (And Everything Else); Bernanke"s Ploy

Thursday, February 21, 2013

The night Sony didn"t pull a new PlayStation out of its hat

How many movies do you see in the theater a year? Two per month, maybe? At that rate, that’s 75 hours you’re spending in the theater each year, if every movie lasts three hours.

But stats show that Americans on average spend a lot more time — 142 hours a year — playing video games. That’s why Sony’s PS4 announcement last night is a big deal, even though company didn’t necessarily unveil its new gaming console.

“The biggest surprise of last night was the fact that there wasn’t even a console in the house,” says CNET’s Jeff Bakalar, who covered the event in New York.

Though they lacked hardware, Bakalar says Sony did promote new console features, such as social gaming and Internet connectivity.

To hear more about Sony’s PlayStation plans, click on the audio player above.

Latest Stories on Marketplace.org


The night Sony didn"t pull a new PlayStation out of its hat