Showing posts with label Number. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Number. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

FOXNEWS overtakes all of cable last week in BOTH prime and total day, ranking number one for week, according to NIELSEN. USA fell to #2… Developing…



Fox News Channel’s coverage of the bombing at the Boston Marathon last week propelled the network to the top of the cable rankings for the first time in nearly a decade. In both total day and primetime for the April 15 to April 21, the News Corp-owned news network pulled ahead of usually top ranked USA.


FLASH: FOXNEWS overtakes all of cable last week in BOTH prime and total day, ranking number one for week, according to NIELSEN.


CNN’s King says mistakes last week were ‘embarrassing’


http://www.wtop.com/1326/3296052/CNNs-King-says-mistakes-last-week-were-embarrassing



Did you already share this? No? Share it now:

















InvestmentWatch




FOXNEWS overtakes all of cable last week in BOTH prime and total day, ranking number one for week, according to NIELSEN. USA fell to #2… Developing…

Saturday, April 13, 2013

Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire; Spoon-Fed Demands by the Number

On Wednesday I reported Fools in Cyprus to Sell Gold, Hike Corporate Taxes to Finance Small Part of Bailout.

That rumor was quickly (but unbelievably) denied.


On Thursday, the International Business Times reported Cyprus Denies Rumor It Will Sell Its Gold To Raise Funds; Option Raises Same Question For Others.

A Central Bank of Cyprus spokesperson said Wednesday that rumors stating that it would sell 75 percent (approximately 10 tons or $ 523 million) of its gold were inaccurately reported by Reuters. Aliki Stylianou told the Cyprus News Agency, or CNA, that no such deal was ever “raised, discussed or debated” with the bank’s board of directors.

No Such Deal Ever Raised! Really?


In spite of denials that any such deal was ever “raised, discussed or debated” I knew what was about to happen. Sure enough ….


Cyprus Gold Sale Must Cover Emergency Loan Loss


ECB President Mario Draghi says Any Cyprus Gold Sale Must Cover Emergency-Loan Loss

European Central Bank President Mario Draghi said the profits of any gold sales by the Cypriot central bank must be used to cover losses it may sustain from emergency loans to Cypriot commercial banks.

European creditors today left a possible gold sale in the hands of the Cypriot central bank, which manages 13.9 metric tons of the metal, according to the World Gold Council.


“The decision is going to be taken by the central bank,” Draghi said after a meeting of euro-area finance officials in Dublin. “What’s important, however, is that what is being transferred to the government budget out of the profits made out of the sales of gold should cover first and foremost any potential loss that the central bank might have from its ELA.”


ELA stands for Emergency Liquidity Assistance, a lifeline that can be offered by national central banks in the euro region to commercial banks that can’t get funding.


Asked about a letter he wrote to Cyprus President Nicos Anastasiades, Draghi said the letter is “very, very clear.” He said the government must abide by the central bank’s handling of the gold stock, since it is independent from political control under European rules.


More Lies Than One


Did you catch that last statement? Draghi says central bank handling of gold is “independent from political control under European rules”.


Apparently independence is relative. The Central Bank of Cyprus has no such independence. It is being forced to sell its gold to cover Emergency Loan Assistance programs by the ECB.


Want more lies? Check this out.


Speaking alongside Draghi, Dutch Finance Minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem said “selling gold has always been an option put forward by the Cypriot authorities. But as mentioned in the program documentation, this is a decision to be made independently by the Cypriot central bank. And it’s not any demand from the troika or the eurogroup.


So this was an independent decision made by the central bank of Cyprus, yet denied by the central bank of Cyprus. Apparently the gold sale just happens to be the only way Cyprus can cover losses on ELA, no other method would do.


So Cyprus is forced to dump most of its “excess” gold reserves. A reader asked me yesterday what was meant by “excess” gold reserves. Certainly the name is strange. It implies central banks can have too much of the stuff. They can’t.


In reality, the term means whatever the hell ECB wants it to mean. In this case, the term is a convenient way to make sure the noose in Cyprus’ nose is as tight as can be.


I discussed that idea two days ago in the link at the top. Here is the pertinent snip.

Road to Hyperinflation

Raising taxes in the middle of a recession is bad enough. Cyprus actually needs a lower tax rate to attract business following its banking debacle.


Selling gold is downright idiotic. Gold backing can prevent a currency from going completely worthless. Should Cyprus leave the eurozone, its small holding of gold would at least put some bid on its currency.


Selling of gold and hiking of corporate taxes puts another noose through the nose of Cyprus (just what the nannycrats in Brussels wants and precisely what the average Cypriot should fear).


A Greek-like implosion with massive unemployment and endless recessions is on the way.


Leaks and Still More Lies


About that Cyprus shortfall… As I expected, it’s a lot bigger than the Troika expected, assuming you believe the Troika was telling the truth about the size of the needed bailout.


The Guardian reports Cyprus forced to find extra €6bn for bailout, leaked analysis shows

Cypriot politicians have reacted with fury to news that the crisis-hit country will be forced to find an extra €6bn (£5bn) to contribute to its own bailout, much of which is expected to come from savers at its struggling banks.

A leaked draft of the updated rescue plan, which emerged late on Wednesday night, revealed that the total bill for the bailout has risen to €23bn, from an original estimate of €17bn, less than a month after the deal was agreed – and the entire extra cost will be imposed on Nicosia.


Visiting Athens, the Cypriot parliament’s president, Yannakis Omirou, said the tiny island nation had been “served poison” by its EU partners.


The €23bn overall bill is larger than an entire year’s output from the Cypriot economy.



Cyprus Hammered Into Submission


Step by step, Cyprus has been hammed into submission. Its economy has been ruined for at least a decade.


Recall the original deal was €13bn. It is now €23bn.
Recall that Cyprus Popular Bank, Laiki, was supposed to have 30% losses. Guess what?


Spoon-Fed Demands by the Number


  1. Laiki 100% wiped out

  2. Capital controls

  3. Losses exceed the size of the entire Cypriot economy

  4. Cyprus would have to sell its gold

  5. The Cypriot Central Bank would lose its independence

  6. Cyprus will go into an economic depression for a decade to pay for the “bailout”

Cyprus has been spoon-fed a pack of escalating demands by the Troika.


Had Cyprus initially understood the totality of what was going to happen, Cyprus may have done the right thing which should now be obvious: Tell the Troika to go to hell, default, exit the eurozone.


It’s still not too late, but Cyprus needs to do so before it sells its gold.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire; Spoon-Fed Demands by the Number

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Eurozone Math; One Size Fits Germany; Door Number Two

Reader “JB” thinks I am blaming Germany for what is happening. That’s not exactly correct, but let’s take a look at what “JB” has to say via email.

Hi Mish,

I read your blog daily. We are generally on the same page. We even agree that in all probability the eurozone will break up. However, You cannot blame the Germany, the German government, or the German people for doing the right thing. Germans can accept austerity. The phrase “tightening the belt” is an axiom in the German language. ….
JB


Hello JB, I think you misunderstand my message. I am not biased against Germany, and I am in favor of “austerity”.


By “austerity” I mean shrinkage of public sector jobs and pensions, and liberalization of work rules.


I am against tax hikes, especially those imposed on Spain, Greece, and Portugal by the nannycrats in Brussels. What the nannycrats call “austerity” is nothing more than devastating tax hikes coupled with minimal, if any work rule reforms.


My message is primarily a function of math.


Eurozone Math


  • Germany was the primary beneficiary of the ECB’s “one size fits Germany” interest rate policy.

  • It is mathematically impossible for every country to be an exporter like Germany

  • It is mathematically impossible for one interest rate to work when there is a multitude of fiscal policies

  • It is mathematically impossible for the euro to survive without a transfer mechanism of some sort from Germany to peripheral Europe, and Germany will not allow any transfer mechanisms

  • It is mathematically impossible within the realm of the euro for Spain to be more like Germany, unless Germany is less like Germany

  • Germany has ruled out everything that could possibly make the eurozone work.

Euro Architects and Politicians to Blame


I do not blame Germany. I blame all the architects of the euro. I also blame all the politicians making matters worse by trying to force their will on the markets. In that sense, I do blame Merkel, but I also blame Hollande, Sarkozy, Trichet, Draghi, and everyone else involved in this mess, past or present.


One Size Fits Germany (Until it Doesn’t)


The math of the matter is Germany benefited from the Euro and from the ECB’s “one size fits Germany” interest rate policy more than any other country.


As a direct result of the unstable eurozone treaty, sovereign interest rate imbalances, Target II imbalance, and trade imbalances are out of control. Germany and the other European creditor countries are owed money that cannot be paid back.


Door Number Two


The eurozone cannot work as is, and Germany is going to pay the price one two ways.


  1. Germany Forgives Loans to European Debtor Nations

  2. The debtor nations exit the eurozone and default

German taxpayers do not want to bail out the rest of Europe. And if I was a German taxpayer I would have the same stance. Without assigning blame to Germany, the math is what it is: unsustainable.


Pick your poison. Is it door number one or door number two? Odds overwhelmingly favor door number two.


Even diehard supporter of the eurozone now see it cannot work. For example, please see Eurointelligence Founder Wolfgang Münchau, Once a Staunch Euro Supporter, Now Welcomes the Anti-Euro Party “Alternative for Germany”.


Soros On Board


George Soros is still a eurozone supporter, but he understands it cannot work without eurobonds. I do not believe the eurozone can work with eurobonds as I expect tensions will be high. Soros’ second-best alternative is for Germany to exit the eurozone.


That has been my #1 idea for a long time. I explained it recently in Illusions of Stabilization.

Failed Experiment

The Eurozone is a failed experiment. Structural flaws were too great initially, and they have increased over the years. No currency union in history has ever survived unless there was also a fiscal union. Current politics says it cannot happen, on meaningful terms.


Breakup Inevitable, But How?


A breakup is inevitable, just as it has been from the beginning. The key is to manage a breakup in the least destructive manner.


Breakup Options


Option 1: If Germany (and the northern states) left the eurozone, the Deutschmark (and respective currencies) would immediately be credible. The downside to Germany (and the northern states) is debts to German banks would not be paid back in Deutschmarks but rather deflated (but not worthless) Euros.


Option 2: The second option is a piecemeal, destructive breakup. Should Greece and Spain leave first, those countries might experience a complete loss of faith in currency resulting in hyperinflation. The Northern states would be paid back in worthless notes, if they were paid back at all.


Germany Suffers Regardless


Note that Germany and the Northern creditor nations suffer regardless. Either they keep ponying up bailout money, there is a managed breakup, or a piecemeal destructive breakup. It would be best for all involved if Germany left the eurozone and went back to the Deutschmark.


There are no other options, and no other choices. Meanwhile, imbalances grow and German taxpayers keep funneling tax dollars to the Southern states to keep them afloat.


Merkel Not a Savior


Many Germans view Merkel as a hero for her tough stance on Cyprus.


However, Merkel is neither a savior nor a hero. Her stance is always one of political necessity. Every step of the crisis she has done the politically expedient such as caving in to Sarkozy and providing funds for Greece but not for Cyprus.


Sentiment in Germany in favor of holding the eurozone together is strong provided German taxpayers do not have to pony up another dime. The irony is Germany was the main beneficiary of the ECB’s “one size fits Germany” interest rate policy that destroyed Spain and peripheral Europe.


Sentiment Does Not Change the Math


Sentiment does not change the eurozone math, but it does impact the way the eurozone breaks apart.


Expect a piecemeal, destructive breakup.


Some will blame Germany. I blame a mathematically unworkable treaty that was flawed from the beginning. I also blame all the politicians who supported the idea even though it was fatally flawed.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Eurozone Math; One Size Fits Germany; Door Number Two

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Is 3.80 The Scariest Number For The Bulls?

‘Nothing can stop us now’ appears to be the message we are being fed as Bullard et al. confirm we should rest assured that the Fed will pump as long as there’s a sun in the sky. However, there is a little fly in that ointment that just keeps on popping up. As Barclays’ Barry Knapp notes, gas prices have risen high enough to hurt stocks if history is any guide. Gas prices, which have risen every day since January 17th are pressuring the critical $ 3.80 level that has capped valuations for the equity market in the last three years. The last times gas prices have risen this high, consumer spending growth has stalled and just as we have noted previously, it appears the only thing that can tame the enthusiasm of a liquidity-addicted equity market is a cash-strapped consumer pulling back. The double-edged sword is simple, Knapp notes: any slowing of economic growth that stems from higher gas prices may prevent companies from meeting earnings projections; whereas sustained expansion would increase the risk of inflation and put pressure on the Fed to scale back its QE4EVA. Rock meet hard place.

 

Chart: Barclays and Bloomberg




Zero Hedge


Is 3.80 The Scariest Number For The Bulls?