Showing posts with label Breaking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Breaking. Show all posts

Saturday, April 27, 2013

BREAKING HUGE: CISPA REJECTED by senate!



A large reason for the failure of CISPA to make it to a floor vote on the Senate was the threat of a veto by President Obama if the bill reached his desk. While the President should be keeping the issue of national security at the forefront of his mind, it’s refreshing to think that in his second term Barack Obama is still focusing on the rights of the people. With legislation involving the internet having far more support among Republicans than Democrats I would not be surprised if the House waited a few more years before reattempting this legislation in the hopes that the odds will be more in their favor. Of course at the same time all it would take is one major cyber attack for the tides to turn in support of an online Big Brother.


http://inthecapital.streetwise.co/2013/04/26/senate-committee-rejects-cispa-due-to-privacy-concerns/



Did you already share this? No? Share it now:

















InvestmentWatch




BREAKING HUGE: CISPA REJECTED by senate!

Thursday, April 18, 2013

BREAKING: Gunshots Heard on MIT Campus!!! Police Officer Hit By Gunfire, In Critical Condition!! … Situation ”Extremely Dangerous’…



BREAKING: #MIT: Shots fired near 32 Vassar St (Stata Center), police officer down. Please stay inside – @thetech


Gunshots were heard near a building on the campus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, the school said on its website on Thursday.


http://www.cnbc.com/id/100655048


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/18/gunshots-reported-on-mit-campus/


Just in: MIT says gunshots were heard near Stata Center outside Kendall Square, advises students to stay clear


https://twitter.com/BostonGlobe


MIT police officer hit by gunfire


http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/04/18/mit-police-officer-hit-gunfire-cambridge-police-dispatcher-says/4UeCClOVeLr8PHLvDa99zK/story.html


BREAKING: Gunshots reported at MIT: MIT police officer has been shot and taken to the hospital @DrewGriffinCNN reports now on @CNN


‘Extremely dangerous’


http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/04/18/17817173-extremely-dangerous-gunshots-reported-on-mit-campus?lite


MIT Reports Gunshots on Campus; Shooter on the Loose and Police Officer May Be Down


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/18/mit-reports-gunshots-on-campus-police-officer-may-be-down/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=story&utm_campaign=Share%20Buttons


The university requested people stay away from Building 32, as police consider the situation still active.


http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/18/us/cambridge-gunshots/index.html


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/gunshots-reportedly-heard-at-mit-campus-2013-04-18-23912729?siteid=bnbh



Did you already share this? No? Share it now:

















InvestmentWatch




BREAKING: Gunshots Heard on MIT Campus!!! Police Officer Hit By Gunfire, In Critical Condition!! … Situation ”Extremely Dangerous’…

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

After Breaking $400, Is Apple Headed to $320?



The Apple sell-off today has been utterly hopeless, with shares breaking through $ 400 for the first time in more than a year. The last time shares were worth less than four Benjamins was before Christmas 2011. Still, is even more pain in store? Could Apple head to $ 320 next?


That’s the case that Creative Global is laying out, with founder and analyst Carlo Besenius adding insult to injury to Apple investors today. Besenius reads the charts, which tell him that $ 380 is a support level from a technical analysis standpoint, but he thinks the true bottom is even lower. Decelerating sales, deteriorating margins, and intensifying competition could push shares all the way down to $ 320 in the coming months.


Besenius’ claim to fame is when he downgraded Apple to “sell” last October before shares cratered from all-time highs. Specifically, shares were trading around $ 685 at the time of his call, and two months later he assigned the Mac maker a price target of $ 420. In February, Besenius further dropped his price target to $ 320, so today’s research note is more of a reiteration of that previous premonition.


I’d normally say that at $ 320, Apple would be trading at 7.3 times earnings or that its cash position would equal 46% of its market cap, but recent history shows that Apple’s fundamentals are futile, since the stock trades purely on momentum and emotion these days.


The news that Cirrus Logic expects lower iDevice volumes has caused both companies to plunge today. The data coming out of the audio-chip specialist lends some credibility to Besenius’ pessimism, since Apple was responsible for 91% of sales in the previous quarter. iPhone weakness could definitely manifest itself in Cirrus Logic’s results.


Not long ago, the idea that Apple might trade at $ 320 would have seemed ludicrous, in part because of the fundamentals. These days, anything seems possible, as Apple’s upcoming earnings and difficult June guidance could further terrify investors into dumping their shares, while fundamental valuation will continue to be meaningless.


One of these days, fundamentals will matter again. In preparation of that day, investors are wondering whether Apple remains a buy from a fundamental perspective. The Motley Fool’s senior technology analyst and managing bureau chief, Eric Bleeker, is prepared to fill you in on both reasons to buy and reasons to sell Apple and what opportunities are left for the company (and your portfolio) going forward. To get instant access to his latest thinking on Apple, simply click here now.


The article After Breaking $ 400, Is Apple Headed to $ 320? originally appeared on Fool.com.


Fool contributor Evan Niu, CFA, owns shares of Apple. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and owns shares of Apple and Cirrus Logic. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don’t all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 – 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.




DailyFinance.com




After Breaking $400, Is Apple Headed to $320?

Friday, April 12, 2013

Marc Faber "I love the Fact that Gold is Finally Breaking Down"; Gold vs. Apple; Patience, Gold, Japan

Marc Faber loves that gold is finally breaking down. The reason is not to gloat, or a prediction. Rather “gold will offer an excellent buying opportunity“.

Link if video does not play Faber: Gold Isn’t Down as Much as Apple.

Marc Faber on Bloomberg TV on the Fall in Gold Prices

“I love the markets. I love the fact that gold is finally breaking down. That will offer an excellent buying opportunity. I would just like to make one comment. At the moment, a lot of people are knocking gold down. But if we look at the records, we are now down 21% from the September 2011 high. Apple is down 39% from last year’s high. At the same time, the S&P is at about not even up 1% from the peak in October 2007. Over the same period of time, even after today’s correction gold is up 100%. The S&P is up 2% over the March 2000 high. Gold is up 442%. So I am happy we have a sell-off that will lead to a major low. It could be at $ 1400, it could be today at $ 1300, but I think that the bull market in gold is not completed.”

“$ 1300. Nobody knows for sure but I think the fundamentals for gold are still intact. I would like to make one additional comment. Today we have commodities breaking down including gold. At the same time we have bonds rallying very strongly. If you stand aside and you look at these two events, it would suggest that they are strongly deflationary pressures in the system. If that was the case, I wouldn’t buy stocks or sovereign bonds because the stock market would be hit by disappointing profits if there was a deflationary environment.”

On gold falling lower if we have a deflationary environment:


“Yes, I agree. That’s why I said if the gold market collapse is saying something about deflation and at the same time we have this sharp rise in bond prices and the signals are correct that we have deflation, I wouldn’t buy stocks because in a deflationary environment, corporate profits will disappoint very badly.”


On whether a deflationary environment is possible right now:


“Everything is possible…In the economy of the cuckoo people that populate central banks, everything is possible. What you have is gigantic bubbles, the NASDAQ in 2000, then the housing bubble and then commodities in 2008 when oil went from $ 78 to $ 147 before plunging to $ 32 within sixth months. That kind of volatility comes from expansionary monetary policies from money-printing.”


“All I’m saying is that I think we’re going to have a major low in gold in within the next couple of weeks. Gold, as of today, you should actually buy as a trade. I think it can rebound in the next two days by $ 40.”

On why gold will rebound $ 40 in the next two days:


“Because we are about in gold as oversold and we were essentially during the crash in 1987. From there we have a strong rebound. All I am saying as a trader I would probably enter the market quickly for a rebound of $ 20 or $ 40. From a longer term perspective, I would give it some time. We may go lower. I am not worried. I am happy gold is finally coming down, which will provide a very good entry point.”

On whether investors should also stay in cash:


“My argument is that you should always have in this kind of high volatility environment a fair amount of cash because opportunities will always arise again and again and if you have cash you can then buy assets at a reasonable price. I think Patience is very important in this environment. The question is, how do you hold your cash? Hopefully not with a Cyprus bank.”


Patience, Gold, Japan


Patience, Gold, and Japan were my central themes in the speech I gave at the Wine Country Conference. I hope to have the speech up soon.


When I am in general agreement with Faber, we tend to be correct…. eventually. Like Marc, I am not at all worried about the precise timing.


If you have not yet read Faber’s book, Tomorrow’s Gold: Asia’s age of discovery, I advise you to do so. It’s not about gold per se, rather about long-term investment opportunities.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Marc Faber "I love the Fact that Gold is Finally Breaking Down"; Gold vs. Apple; Patience, Gold, Japan

Monday, April 8, 2013

Margaret Thatcher"s legacy: Three things that changed for the U.K.

Former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher, also known as “The Iron Lady,” died on Monday.


A leader whose tactics and policies were widely disputed during and after her 11-year term (the longest for any British politician), Thatcher made a lasting impact on the nation — economically, socially and culturally.


She was steadfast on her set of principles, which became known as “Thatcherism.” What exactly were those priniples? According to the New York Times they’re “the belief that economic freedom and individual liberty are interdependent, that personal responsibility and hard work are the only ways to national prosperity, and that the free-market democracies must stand firm against aggression.”


Here are three of the policies that’ll remain in her legacy:


1. Raising the tax burden.


Denying the advice of many academic economists at the time, she raised the tax burden and curtailed public sector budgets. According to the BBC, 364 of Britain’s leading economists condemned her policies in a letter to the Times, predicting a worsening slump in a recession already marked by mass unemployment. But the following eight years saw economic revival with annual growth above 3 percent.


2. Breaking labor unions.


Thatcher broke the power of the labor unions. She stood against the all-powerful National Union of Mineworkers and announced plans to shut down several plants and eliminate thousands of jobs. A violent strike by coal miners erupted. It lasted nearly a year, but ended without settlement — though with Thatcher as the clear victor.


3. “Popular Capitalism.”


Thatcher pushed hard for bringing “popular capitalism” to Britain, moving major state industries like telephones and gas supply to the private sector. The economy thrived to the point that in 1985, the Treasury announced it would not need deficit spending in the next fiscal budget.



What Thatcher didn’t change


Nonetheless, Thatcher did face a number of drawbacks.


She did not follow through with her plans to privatize the water industry or the National Health Service, and failed to revamp Social Security. Inflation rose and inflation rates remained high. Among political tensions, she resigned from office in 1990.


Latest Stories on Marketplace.org




Margaret Thatcher"s legacy: Three things that changed for the U.K.

Saturday, March 16, 2013

[08] NDAA, Syrian Intervention, Fed Stimulus, BP Criminality | Breaking The Set



Abby Martin is breaking the set on Syrian Intervention & BP Criminality. LIKE Breaking The Set @ http://fb.me/BreakingTheSet FOLLOW Abby Martin @ http://twit…
Video Rating: 4 / 5





[08] NDAA, Syrian Intervention, Fed Stimulus, BP Criminality | Breaking The Set